The Conspiracy Theory that is Climate Change!
A review of key historical milestones in the construction of a fabrication
“The danger of global warming is as yet unseen, but real enough for us to make changes and sacrifices, so that we do not live at the expense of future generations.” -Margaret Thatcher
Margaret Thatcher believed in global warming and, while a conservative stalwart, did more to convince world leaders than any other, early on, that things must be done. Thatcher used the threat of global warming to counter striking coalminers—as in you will be obsolete—in the mid-80s (which of course brings to mind our own Joe Biden’s proclamation that Green New Deal displaced coalminers in West Virginia should learn how to code).
Thatcher became a full-fledged convert by the late 80s. She pushed the formation of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Supposedly it is a committee comprised of scientists with unassailable credentials who all agree—97%—that man (and I guess women) have contributed to torching the earth. In reality, it is a committee comprised of some questionable scientists, other scientists who were hoodwinked (and after seeing how the committee was using their work, asked for their studies to be withdrawn from IPCC reports), and, most importantly, mounds of worthless bureaucrats who are there to write up air-gasping fear porn to gloriously spread the gospel of global cataclysm.
“Our immediate task is to carry as many countries as possible with us, so that we can negotiate a successful framework convention on climate change in 1992,” she [Thatcher] said in [a] 1990 speech. “To accomplish these tasks, we must not waste time and energy disputing the IPCC's report or debating the right machinery for making progress.” [Emphasis mine]
I suppose we can be happy that it’s taken over 30 years to get to this point.
Inconvenient Facts
Al “The Gorical” Gore went on this crusade with some inconvenient and irrelevant facts however, polar bear populations are increasing not decreasing; global ice sheets are increasing not decreasing; coral reefs are growing despite the doomsday scenarios, etcetera. It was his manufactured hysteria that has catapulted Climate Change! into what it has become today. Of course, it can be argued that The Gorical is one of the stupidest persons on the broiling earth but I could easily counter that the man has made serious green from the green agenda and, while a huckster, he isn’t a stupid one.
While Thatcher started the engine, Gore, the High Priest of Warmth, put it into high gear.
How Dare You!
Climate Change! began floundering as a cause célèbre until a little girl came along that would jumpstart the flimsy conspiracy theory into, well, a conspiracy theory with teeth.
Greta Thunberg’s famous “How dare you!” speech was chilling coming from a child and I won’t disparage a kid. Self-admittedly, she has Asperger syndrome, obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD), and selective mutism. This, in no way, disqualifies her from a point of view regardless its absurdity. I blame her parents first and foremost but they couldn’t protect her from the true evils in this world: the Davos crowd and His Galactic Majesty Herr Doktor Klaus Schwab. Seig heil!
Thunberg denounced capitalism so now that she’s an adult, I guess, flame away; but she recently endorsed nuclear power. The freezing eurocrates must be having second thoughts about unleashing energy Armageddon too soon.
Settled Science
First, my definition of science: Science is the art of observation. Science ebbs and flows with knowledge based upon the best possible theories from learned humans—hopefully the best trained and visionary that mankind can offer—to explain their observations through hypothesis, experimentation, analysis, and conclusion, i.e., the scientific method. The artfulness of imagination opens the realm of truth, for an observation may have many different causes and through original skeptical analysis, a possible truth can be reached. Science is never settled.
Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW), the first iteration of Climate Change!, has not been studied in this way. It began with crackpot assumptions that were turned into models which then could not even begin to provide answers to imagined observations. There are at least 32 climate models plus offshoots that are used to support the “scientific notion” of Climate Change! All of them have, on average, predicted warming seven times higher than real world observations. Earth’s climate is more complex than what mere humans can predict. Try as they may, model tinkering by climate scientists makes further mockery of their assertions.
As new generations of supposedly improved climate models are produced and refined, the accuracy of their temperature simulations decreases. Each new generation of general circulation models fails to track or correspond to a greater degree with measured temperature changes and trends than the previous generation.
Their “models” are at the heart of the assertions of Climate Change! If the models do not predict the future—nor can they be made to predict the past using historical data—how then can anyone believe that Earth’s atmosphere is truly on fire?
If you believe in your heart of hearts that mankind is a destructive force first and foremost, then it becomes easy to believe in your own bullshit. It’s the fear of mankind’s constructive abilities that drive the drivel of the charlatans behind the crusade, for they only believe in mankind’s destructive abilities.
I Am Science
Before Anthony “I Am Science” Fauci, Michael “Burning” Mann, Ph.D. held the coveted prize. He provided the alarmism that allowed the High Priest of Warmth to make his science fiction movie An Inconvenient Truth. The Burning Mann is the inventor of the “Hockey Stick” graph that, in the late 90s scared the crap out of many a gullible person, including The Gorical (and Maggie Thatcher). The “hokey” stick has been debunked by several scientific studies (here and here, as examples). It’s also been identified as a biased means to mislead the public into Climate Change! belief.
The late Canadian climatologist Dr. Tim Ball claimed that Mann, climate professor at Penn State University, “belongs in the state pen, not Penn State.” Mann’s hubris, of course, dictated that he file suit against Ball. The court ruled for Ball and against Mann, particularly after Mann refused to produce his data that was used to construct his famous graph, saying that it was proprietary (despite the fact that American taxpayers funded his research).
“The Supreme Court of British Columbia dismissed the defamation lawsuit because Mann refused to provide the data he used to construct his climate models. “In 2003 a Canadian study showed the “hockey stick” curve “is primarily an artifact of poor data handling, obsolete data and incorrect calculation of principal components.” [Emphasis from article] When the data was corrected it showed a warm period in the 15th Century that exceeded the warmth of the 20th Century.”
A comparison of the two graphs show a remarkable difference: Mann’s suggests that climate has been static until mankind began burning fossil fuels; the second graph reflects a more dynamic climate.
Scientists have been able to determine climate patterns going back at least a millennium (and more) by use of proxy data. Since the Holy Roman Empire lacked sophisticated weather measuring devices, scientists use proxy data collection such as ice core samples from the two poles and glaciers as well as tree ring cores to examine chemical compositions and growth patterns that would be dictated by the climate at any given time period. The evidence shows warming during the Medieval Warm Period—warmer than today—and cooling as witnessed by what’s termed the Little Ice Age.
Burning Mann has scurried off to his academic world but is always looking to cash in and terrify at the same time. Despite his defeat in the court, he still peddles his bullshit from the safe confines of the Penn State, hawking a children’s book to teach kids to throw tantrums in order to drive home the “facts” about Climate Change! If someone really wanted to save the world from this charlatan, they would sue the university for fraudulent use of taxpayer monies.
The Data
One factor that pushes the annual announcement that the past year was the warmest on record is from what is called the urban heat island effect.
One afternoon, with the dying sun to my left, I walked the dog near a seven-story mid-rise around the block from our house. As I passed, I was hit on my right side by a death ray. I immediately began to sweat. If I had a thermometer with me, the temperature radiating from the mountain of concrete would be 10 to 15 degrees warmer than the surrounding area. This is called a heat island and is at the heart of much of the data manipulation using weather stations located in large cities.
Once city weather stations are eliminated from the data, it is obvious in this sparsely cited NOAA data set, man has little to no effect on the climate—at least for the past 20 years. In fact, most “clean” data shows no significant warming since at least 1998.
Since California became a state [1850], the measured global rise in atmospheric temperature has been less than 10C. But most of this increase occurred prior to 1940, [emphasis mine] and average planetary temperatures fell from around 1943 until about 1978, leading to a global cooling scare. Temperatures rose slightly until 1998, then mostly remained stable, even as carbon dioxide levels continued to rise. Rising CO2 levels and temperature variations do not correlate very well at all.
Moreover, during the well-documented Medieval Warm Period from about 950 to 1350, warmer global temperatures allowed Viking farmers to raise crops and tend cattle in Greenland. The equally well documented 500-year Little Ice Age starved and froze the Vikings out of Greenland, before reaching its coldest point, the Maunder Minimum, 1645-1715. That’s when England’s River Thames regularly froze over, Norwegian farmers demanded compensation for lands buried by advancing glaciers, and priests performed exorcism rituals to keep alpine glaciers away from villages. Paintings from the era show crowds of people ice skating and driving horse-drawn carriages on the Thames.
At this point in the story, we would have to jump down the rabbit hole—which is where these warmists want you to jump into, headfirst. They dazzle with bullshit and make-believe studies and worthless models that paint man bad and fossil fuels worse. There are media stories going back to the 1930s with alternating alarms of global warming and global cooling, all brought upon our land by the scourge of mankind. None of these stories have provided any real-world data observations to back their claims—especially the unimpressive climate models—and none of them have come true.
Hide The Decline
In November 2009 a hacker released 61 megabytes of data, including voluminous emails that had circulated among climate scientists. These emails detailed efforts to remove official climate data in order to bolster claims of manmade global warming. By lowering temperature data from the 1940s forward provides a mirage of sky rocking temperatures into the late 1990s. More emails were released later, further substantiating the facts that climate researchers falsified and manipulated data to bolster the needed wizardry of climate science to then feed back into the loop for amassing political power and the all-important research grant dollars. The above chart comparing Burning Mann’s hokey stick to Balls’ analysis of clean data exposes such manipulation. The climate conspiracy theorists have also used “cherry-picked” data to support a historical mild climate of the past. The term “hide the decline” refers to massaged data that lowers the average climate during medieval times so that claims, such as unprecedented modern warming, can be justified.
As with all things scandalous, this became known as Climategate. It should surprise no one that for money and notoriety, erudite people will lie and exaggerate to prove their superiority. Further delving into all things Climategate lays down a compelling argument that scientists have abandoned all basic methods of scientific inquiry in order to fulfill a political and financial agenda.
Climate Change! should have died an inglorious death in 2010.
Promoting the Conspiracy Theory
From its very beginnings, Climate Change! has been a useful political pawn and has morphed into a political movement to deliver power into the hands of fascists who, for their own diabolical means, want to deconstruct Western Civilization and return to a feudal system where those without political power will fall to their knees, begging for the scraps (or insects) from the royal table. The immoral take millions of dollars to pimp for these fascists. Self-admittedly, the Associated Press, along with many others have their hands out and their wallets full.
(2/16/22) NEW YORK (AP) — The Associated Press said Tuesday that it is assigning more than two dozen journalists across the world to cover climate issues, in the news organization’s largest single expansion paid for through philanthropic grants.
The announcement illustrates how philanthropy has swiftly become an important new funding source for journalism — at the AP and elsewhere — at a time when the industry’s financial outlook has been otherwise bleak. [Emphasis mine]
Climate Change! is a conspiracy theory, nothing more. If it is truly an existential threat to humanity then why do mockingbird media outlets—guns for hire—have to take money from nameless “philanthropists” in order to spread the gospel? If they weren’t broke, would they cover this “crisis” on their own?
Not All Climate Scientists Believe
Many scientists that oppose the theory of AGW or Climate Change! or frying eggs on sidewalks in the near future (except in Arizona, which can be done now), are kneecapped by the climate mafia. As exposed in Climategate, skeptical scientists regularly request data from the climate warriors and have been denied; in many cases the stated reason was lost data. Let that sink in. This is a theory that is now considered settled yet, the data they used to substantiate their claims is “lost”? This is supposed to be believed? Or is it that the data is so compromised with manipulation that a true scientist would see it upon first examination.
From the Climategate files, there is strong indication that scientists providing data to counter warming claims were sidelined from scientific publications (which seems to be a page borrowed by the Covid overlords).
The hacked CRU emails also showed exchanges between Mann and [Phil] Jones [discredited former head of the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in the UK], in which they discussed how to intimidate editors who wanted to publish scientific views contrary to theirs, to suppress any contradictory studies. In one email, Jones expressed his desire to get rid of the “troublesome editor” of the Climate Research journal for daring to publish differing views. The editor got sacked.
Recently, scientists have broken through the barriers. Instead of buying into the devilishness of mankind, 23 scientists co-authored a 2021 study suggesting that the sun has much more influence over climate than mankind’s use of fossil fuels. Another 500 sent a certified letter to the United Nations Secretary-General stating that there is no climate emergency.
Another scientist also did the unthinkable and called the bluff. Mototaka Nakamura, Ph.D. from MIT and holding positions at MIT, Georgia Institute of Technology, NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, JAMSTEC, and Duke University, wrote a short book entitled Confessions of a climate scientist: the global warming hypothesis is an unproven hypothesis.
Written in Japanese, it is well summarized by fellow climatologist Tony Thomas. Nakamura states “In climate research and modelling, we should recognize that we are dealing with a coupled non-linear chaotic system, and therefore that the long-term prediction of future climate states is not possible.” He also accuses climate warmists of falsifying data to fit their narrative. Anthropogenic Global Warming has not been proven and lacks scientific evidence for substantializing its hypothesis.
Why are they using Climate Change! as the greatest existential threat the world has ever faced?
The Climate Cult
At the heart of most cults beats a cataclysm. There is nothing like a good old fashioned looming end-of-the-world scenario to get people to believe. There have been many Climate Change! soothsayers that have admitted to ginning up rhetoric to sway people toward action. These are the true believers who are, in their own minds, doing Gia’s work.
At the base of every structure, whether physical or metaphorical, a strong foundation must be laid. The fallout from Climategate exposed massive cracks throughout the concrete foundation to warn everyone that the structure would eventually collapse but like a shady contractor, they’ve smoothed fresh concrete over the visible cracks and declared the foundation stronger than any ever constructed. They’re building a skyscraper that will eventually crash. Timing is everything, though, and if the climate cult is successful in fundamentally changing the world, it doesn’t matter if the apocalypse never appears; civilization will be too weakened to even notice.
The World Economic Forum—speaking of cracked foundations—has bet the farm that they will be allowed to dictate individual nation’s policies in order to usher in Herr Doktor Klaus Schwab’s Fourth Industrial Revolution. Seig heil! His Great Reset utilizing the crisis du jour is his cattle prod to herd the clueless into their preassigned pens. Any calamity on earth has always included Climate Change! as the problem, so they say.
If you’ve noticed all of the strange weather that has been occurring over the past three years, they say it is Climate Change! Most meteorologists will disagree unless they’re already in the cult. There are two climate events that drive the larger weather patterns throughout the world: “Sea surface temperatures in the central and eastern tropical Pacific vary between being warmer than average (El Niño) and cooler than average (La Niña).” Currently, Earth is experiencing its third La Niña in a row, not completely unheard of but rare all the same and produces much of the same weather we have been experiencing.
There is also a theory that the sun’s activity drives weather patterns, which is kind of a no shit proposition though the cult denies the sun’s impact on climate. The current solar cycle has the sun at its lowest output since the Little Ice Age which forces the jet streams, usually in a tight flow around the two polar regions, into a meandering mess that pushes unusually large amounts of frigid air into jet stream bulges and sucks warmer air from the tropics to higher latitudes in both hemispheres. If this theory is correct, as documented extensively at Electroverse, then we may be heading into another Little Ice Age.
The WEF and its paid lackeys will claim a common cold is due to Climate Change! It’s simply not true. There is no causal relationship between carbon dioxide and the climate. My hope is that people will begin questioning the cult and deny Climate Change! once and for all.
[Note: the World Economic Forum was changed to reflect an error in naming the organization the World Economic Foundation.]